Which Supreme Court case established guidelines for the use of force?

The case of Graham vs. Connor established the standard for determining whether the use of force by law enforcement officers is excessive under the Fourth Amendment. This decision set forth the "objective reasonableness" standard, which asserts that the appropriateness of an officer's use of force should be evaluated from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, considering the circumstances at hand.

In this ruling, the Supreme Court emphasized that the analysis should focus on the moment the force was applied, acknowledging that officers often have to make quick decisions in tense and rapidly evolving situations. This case provides critical guidance for law enforcement agencies regarding when and how much force can be legitimately used in various scenarios, balancing the necessity of enforcing the law with the protection of individual rights.

The other cases listed address different aspects of law enforcement and constitutional rights. For example, Miranda vs. Arizona is concerned with the rights of individuals during police interrogations, focusing on ensuring detainees are informed of their rights. Terry vs. Ohio pertains to the principles of stop-and-frisk and the criteria for reasonable suspicion. Casey vs. United States deals with administrative procedures rather than directly with use-of-force standards. Thus, Graham vs. Connor distinctly stands out as the pivotal case regarding guidelines for the use of force