Should an ankle lock or foot lock be done if an officer is alone without backup?

The rationale for deciding not to perform an ankle lock or foot lock when an officer is alone without backup is rooted in safety concerns and the nature of confrontation dynamics. Engaging in such techniques can leave the officer vulnerable. These techniques require close proximity to the subject, which may limit the officer's ability to respond to any sudden changes in the suspect's behavior or to manage potential threats from additional individuals who may be present but are not immediately visible.

When an officer is alone, they may not have the necessary support if the situation escalates or if the subject becomes non-compliant. The lack of backup increases the risk of losing control of the situation, as the officer may be focused on the submission of the subject rather than maintaining situational awareness. Therefore, prioritizing safety and the ability to manage the encounter effectively without the risk of being compromised is critical.

Overall, the decision to refrain from performing these holds without backup reflects a tactical approach that prioritizes the officer's ability to maintain control over the situation rather than engaging in a high-risk maneuver that could escalate violence or lead to injury.